Issue Information

HEALTHCARE

EMPLOYER BASED HEALTH CARE:
THE DANGER OF HEALTH CARE PLAN LIABILITY

Legislation introduced in the Ohio General Assembly creates a new type of state tort liability which will threaten the ability of Ohio employers to provide health care benefits to their employees. Essentially, the bills are designed to allow individuals to sue their employer's state-regulated health care plan if the plan does not pay for a specific medical treatment they desire - whether it is an experimental cancer treatment or aromatherapy.

To attract and retain skilled workers, employers voluntarily provide health care benefits as part of their wage and benefit program. Through managed health care plans, employers pay for medically appropriate treatment for their workers and their families. If this legislation is enacted, the results will be catastrophic to Ohio workers. Employers who provide managed health care benefits will risk not only an increase in costs, but also the possibility of being sued. Those who cannot bear these risks may be forced to drop or reduce health care benefits or to increase employee cost-sharing. Ohio employers will be placed in the untenable position of trying to balance the need to be financially competitive to stay in business, against the need to recruit and keep skilled workers.

Employers Can't Be Shielded
The bills purport to shield employers from liability, but realistically, employers cannot be protected. The liability provision may be applied to employers who sponsor fully-insured and self-insured benefit plans. Although current federal ERISA law exempts most self-insured plans from direct state regulation, changes in the law, recent court cases and the practice of hiring state-regulated administrators for self-insured plans are eroding the ERISA preemption protection.

An employer that exercises any discretionary authority over a health care plan, whether selecting the plan or reviewing coverage decisions, becomes subject to liability. To escape the risk of a lawsuit, employers would have to totally abandon any involvement in the health care plan offered to their workers.

While the legislation states that employers are exempt from the new, statutory liability provision, it does not stop the courts from creating new common law causes of action against employers. Ultimately, the decision on whether employers are liable will be left to the courts around the state, some of which have typically not been favorable towards business.

Health Care Liability Will Increase Costs And Reduce Access To Coverage
A 1998 Barents Group study estimated that the liability provision alone would add an additional 8.6 percent to health premiums that are already expected to increase 5 to 20 percent this year.

A 1% increase in health care premiums has been estimated to cause approximately 200,000 people to loose coverage.

A US Chamber of Commerce survey found that 57% of small employers would be likely to drop health care coverage if they were exposed to additional liability.

Consumers Will Lose and Trial Lawyers Will Win
The first, best protection for consumers is access to affordable, quality care. Marketplace competition during the past several years has contained health care costs and expanded the availability of health care benefits for more Ohioans. Holding employers and health plans liable will force employers to increase employee cost-sharing, cut back coverage or drop health care plans altogether.
There would be greater involvement by the courts and trial lawyers in the health care decision-making process, encouraging more lawsuits and increasing the burden on an already over-utilized court system.

Increased lawsuits would channel benefit dollars to trial lawyers and away from claims payments and efforts to improve the quality of care. Only 43 cents of every dollar awarded in medical liability litigation goes to patients (Rand Corp). Trial lawyers would reap a financial windfall.

Conclusion
Resolving payment and coverage disputes in a timely manner is a laudable goal, but it will not be met through the addition of tort lawsuits. If this liability legislation is enacted, health care costs will increase, the oversight of medical treatment to assure appropriateness will become less effective, and employers will be forced to reduce or eliminate health care coverage. More Ohioans will become uninsured and the competitive business climate of the state will be damaged. The establishment of a fair and timely dispute resolution process is a more effective and less costly way to ensure that patients receive the benefits to which they are entitled.