Small
Business Legislative Testimony
Testimony
presented before the House Committee on Economic Development
and Small Business
Tuesday, April 4, 2000
by BJ Wiberg, director of the Chamber's Ohio Small Business
Council.
Chairman Krebs, Vice Chair Calvert and members of the committee,
my name is BJ Wiberg. I am the director of the Ohio Small
Business Council (OSBC), a division of the Ohio Chamber of
Commerce.
As you probably recall from previous times I have testified,
the OSBC is governed by a 21-member board of small business
owners and operators from throughout Ohio. With approximately
4,300 Ohio-based small business members, we are primarily
concerned with public policies that affect the environment
in which these businesses, and more than 250,000 others like
them, operate.
I come before you today to testify in support of HB 574 which
proposes to create a joint legislative committee to examine
how we can retain high technology start-up businesses in Ohio;
identify the factors that motivate them to locate in, or relocate
out of our state; and assess the overall impact these businesses
have on Ohio's economy.
Two recent national studies reveal a disturbing picture in
terms of Ohio's small business environment compared to the
other forty-nine states. In the 1999 analysis of the Economic
Freedom In America's 50 States, conducted by the Center for
Policy and Legal Studies at Clemson University, Ohio ranks
among the bottom third -- lower than states like Indiana,
Kentucky, Michigan and West Virginia. And, according to the
Small Business Survival Index 1998: Ranking the Environment
for Entrepreneurship Across fhe Nation, Ohio ranks 43rd among
the fifty states.
Clearly, we must find ways to improve Ohio's environment for
small business investment, risk taking and growth potential.
As the private sector evolves into new and emerging fields
in areas such as communications, information gathering and
dissemination, biomedicine and biotechnology, the impact of
new developments is difficult to imagine today -- and the
more urgent it becomes to identify and address the factors
that inhibit Ohio's competitive position.
The health care industry, for example, depends upon advances
in technology for providing optimal care. Biomedical and other
high-tech discoveries are prevalent and even more possible
due to the high standing of Ohio's many academic and private
research institutions. Our ability to market such discoveries
through Ohio-based businesses will promote the retention of
highly skilled professionals in Ohio, which in turn will expand
job and career opportunities for all of our citizens -- your
constituents.
Given Ohio's current competitive status in comparison to the
other states, the Governing Board of the Ohio Small Business
Council believes it is crucial that we gain an understanding
of the issues that are the cause of Ohio's low standing, and
then put in place public policies that will allow Ohio to
be on the cutting-edge and the leading incubator in these
critical areas of small business development.
The study to be conducted by the proposed joint legislative
committee, if broad-based, comprehensive, de-politicized and
applied, will ensure that the right problems are addressed
for the long-term, rather than short-term quick-fixes.
Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, I appreciate this
opportunity to present our testimony today and look forward
to your support for passage of HB 574.
This completes my testimony. I will be pleased to address
any questions you may have. |
|