How does the Ohio Chamber help your company save money on the cost of workers’ compensation in Ohio? Every way we possibly can!

CURRENT EVENTS

October 11 , 2006

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Today, the 10th District Court of Appeals ruled in our favor by overturning the lower court's decision by Judge Connor. The Court concluded that the Secretary of State was justified in issuing the August 25, 2006 letter that notified proponents of the total number of deficient signatures. This letter also triggered the 10-day cure period for proponents to submit supplemental signatures. The Court also found that Judge Connor abused his discretion in issuing the preliminary injunction and reversed his ruling. CLICK HERE for a copy of this decision

BOTTOM LINE: the ten day period to submit additional signatures is over, there is a deficiency in the number of signatures needed for Issue 1 to be on November's ballot, and the Secretary of State can now instruct the local Boards of Election to take this issue off of the ballot. While this is very good news for us, this decision does not ensure the death of Issue 1. The UAW still has the ability to appeal this decision to the Ohio Supreme Court. We will know within the next week or so whether the UAW will execute this appeal option. For now, we at least have a very solid decision in our favor from the 10th District Court of Appeals.

Wednesday, Oct. 11

The 10th District Court of Appeals (case No. 06AP-963) unanimously reversed Judge Connor's lower court decision in our favor. The Court concluded that the Secretary of State was justified in issuing the August 25, 2006 letter that notified proponents of the total number of deficient signatures. This letter also triggered the 10-day cure period for proponents to submit supplemental signatures. The Court also found that Judge Connor abused his discretion in issuing the preliminary injunction and reversed his ruling - lifting the stay of execution

Thurs., Oct. 5

Oral arguments are presented to the 10th District Court of Appeals panel consisting of Judge Sadler, Judge Brown and Judge French.

Monday, Oct. 2
The amicus brief supporting the Secretary of State's appeal of Judge Connor's decision is due. The Ohio Chamber is working with other statewide business associations to file this brief.

Wed., Sept. 27

The 10th Appellate District Court of Appeals approves a motion for stay pending appeal of Judge Connor's decision. This stay requires the Sec. of State not to instruct the County Boards of Election to remove Issue 1 from the ballot pending the outcome of this appeal. (see attached)

Tues., Sept. 26
The Secretary of State's office issues a letter to the Committee for Petitioners stating that they were still deficient in total number of signatures necessary for the SB 7 referendum to be on November's ballot by 13,853 signatures. The proponents still have signature protests pending in a handful of counties, but there are only approx. 1200 signatures in question.

Monday, Sept. 18

Judge Connor of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas issued a ruling granting a preliminary injunction to the proponents. The Court ruled that the Secretary of State should not start the 10-day cure period until all protests of signatures at the local county board of elections level are complete. The proponents were initially unsuccessful in obtaining a temporary restraining order from Judge Connor. The Secretary of State's office is planning to file an appeal this week and will seek a stay of Judge Connor's decision.

For the history on this issue and details on specific provisions of SB 7 being challenged CLICK HERE.

Septmeber 30, 2006
Septmeber 20, 2006
August 28, 2006
July 26, 2006