
Testimony
presented before the House Committee on Economic Development and
Small Business on Tuesday, April 4, 2000 by BJ Wiberg, director
of the Chamber's Ohio Small Business Council.
Chairman Krebs,
Vice Chair Calvert and members of the committee, my name is BJ Wiberg.
I am the director of the Ohio Small Business Council (OSBC), a division
of the Ohio Chamber of Commerce.
As you probably
recall from previous times I have testified, the OSBC is governed
by a 21-member board of small business owners and operators from
throughout Ohio. With approximately 4,300 Ohio-based small business
members, we are primarily concerned with public policies that affect
the environment in which these businesses, and more than 250,000
others like them, operate.
I come before
you today to testify in support of HB 574 which
proposes to create a joint legislative committee to examine how
we can retain high technology start-up businesses in Ohio; identify
the factors that motivate them to locate in, or relocate out of
our state; and assess the overall impact these businesses have on
Ohio's economy.
Two recent
national studies reveal a disturbing picture in terms of Ohio's
small business environment compared to the other forty-nine states.
In the 1999 analysis of the Economic Freedom In America's 50
States, conducted by the Center for Policy and Legal Studies
at Clemson University, Ohio ranks among the bottom third -- lower
than states like Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and West Virginia.
And, according to the Small Business Survival Index 1998: Ranking
the Environment for Entrepreneurship Across fhe Nation, Ohio
ranks 43rd among the fifty states.
Clearly, we
must find ways to improve Ohio's environment for small business
investment, risk taking and growth potential.
As the private
sector evolves into new and emerging fields in areas such as communications,
information gathering and dissemination, biomedicine and biotechnology,
the impact of new developments is difficult to imagine today --
and the more urgent it becomes to identify and address the factors
that inhibit Ohio's competitive position.
The health
care industry, for example, depends upon advances in technology
for providing optimal care. Biomedical and other high-tech discoveries
are prevalent and even more possible due to the high standing of
Ohio's many academic and private research institutions. Our ability
to market such discoveries through Ohio-based businesses will promote
the retention of highly skilled professionals in Ohio, which in
turn will expand job and career opportunities for all of our citizens
-- your constituents.
Given Ohio's
current competitive status in comparison to the other states, the
Governing Board of the Ohio Small Business Council believes it is
crucial that we gain an understanding of the issues that are the
cause of Ohio's low standing, and then put in place public policies
that will allow Ohio to be on the cutting-edge and the leading incubator
in these critical areas of small business development.
The study to
be conducted by the proposed joint legislative committee, if broad-based,
comprehensive, de-politicized and applied, will ensure that the
right problems are addressed for the long-term, rather than short-term
quick-fixes.
Mr. Chairman
and members of the committee, I appreciate this opportunity to present
our testimony today and look forward to your support for passage
of HB 574.
This completes
my testimony. I will be pleased to address any questions you may
have.
|